Obligation to not abuse power and authority

These compliance documents are live pre-released drafts that are specifically not structured for scientific audiences. Specific scientific referencing can be provided in consulting contexts, not limited to practice management, claims management, underwriting or litigation support for professionals or organisations.

Copyright and redistribution rights are governed by our terms of site usage. Communication of factual or typographical errata or other suggestions is welcome. This content was originally contained here (external link), has been split into separate compliance sections on our website and is in need of significant ongoing update.

A journalistic summary of these documents for lay audiences will soon be published.

It is common that patients with ME/CFS must repeatedly pursue enforcement action of their pre-existing rights under statutes, policy and common law. It also known that successful enforcement of pre-existing rights can be followed by retributory abuse of power and authority. It is known that flagrantly retributory generation can include punishing qualified professionals who have leveraged their knowledge of policy, rules and law to enforce lawful requirements in a context of ME/CFS.

Such abuses of power substantiate numerous of law and professional standards, not limited to discrimination and for consequences. These abuses often come with of record keeping obligations. These abuses of power often openly and unlawfully suspend compliance norms and other obligations e.g. by arbitrarily refusing lawful implementation of unambiguous policy when confronted with ME/CFS, without lawful justification to dismiss discrimination or other consequent claims.

Habitual outcomes from holding practitioners to account for normal medical and standards include:

  • removal of complainants from patient lists entirely
  • removal of medications
  • introduction of administrative burdens not applied previously
  • applying identical or analogous abuses of power to family members

These efforts to remove or discourage a patient’s registration are closely related to the obligation to not mislead and to provide sufficient detail: