Identically, models cannot excuse discrimination that is substantiated in law. The simple clinical judgement lawfulness tests above apply to the lawfulness of model driven decision-making. Replacing the word “clinician” with “model” in the tests arrives at identical conclusions: a priori assumption of ineligibility/insufficient eligibility of ME/CFS patient cohorts or individuals is unlawful. Identically, models cannot…Continue readingTests of model-dictated eligibility lawfulness (QCovid score example)
Categories
Tests of model-dictated eligibility lawfulness (QCovid score example)
- Post date 23 July 2021
- Categories In Compliance
- Tags BDD, BDS, Bodily distress, breaches, claims management, Clinical judgement, Compliance, compliance risk, Conversion Disorder, Covid, Discrimination, expertise risk, FND, Functional, Functional Disorder, GET, Influenza, insurance underwriting, intermediation, Judgement, Law, Liability, Long Covid, ME/CFS, medical failure, medical norm, Medically Unexplained Symptoms, medico-legal, MUS, obligation, occupational health, operational risk, PENE, Persistent Physical Symptoms, PESE, Policy, Post Exertional Malaise, practice management, Primary Care, PSS, PTSD, reinsurance, Risk, Somatisation, Somatization, unlawfulness, vaccination, vaccine